Joined
·
7,684 Posts
Totally agree with you on Pete Caroll.
I thought the same way about pete carroll a few yrs ago, until i read his book. Absolutely love his coaching philosophy. yes reggie bush got him into some trouble and not saying he follows it to a t but the whole idea around it i love.9manfan said:That's my darkhorse ( Seahawks) to make the NFC Champ. game, they have played some great football, I think the Pukers will beat the 49ers as their new QB isn't exactly setting the world on fire and Mister Rogers is a heck of a player and has played well, if the Seahawks beat Atlanta and the Pukers win, the NFC Champ game would be in Pukerville I assume .....Go Seahawks (even though I can't stand Pete Carroll)Chuck Smith said:9man.... You are correct. I don't think Ponder would have made one difference.
I give it to the packers they played a good game. They held AP in check (even though he had 99 yards) but they did not let him break a big run. Rodgers was on fire. That drive at the end of the first 1/2....What did it take about 1 min... That is impressive. The packers even had somewhat of a running game. If they play that way again they will beat San Fran. But I think the buzz saw in the NFC is the Sea Hawks. They look tough and are on a roll.
I actually think he is a pretty good coach, I'm just tired of watching his Rah Rah antic's on the sideline, these are grown men playing, there not jr high kids playing football ....Norm70 said:I thought the same way about pete carroll a few yrs ago, until i read his book. Absolutely love his coaching philosophy. yes reggie bush got him into some trouble and not saying he follows it to a t but the whole idea around it i love.9manfan said:That's my darkhorse ( Seahawks) to make the NFC Champ. game, they have played some great football, I think the Pukers will beat the 49ers as their new QB isn't exactly setting the world on fire and Mister Rogers is a heck of a player and has played well, if the Seahawks beat Atlanta and the Pukers win, the NFC Champ game would be in Pukerville I assume .....Go Seahawks (even though I can't stand Pete Carroll)Chuck Smith said:9man.... You are correct. I don't think Ponder would have made one difference.
I give it to the packers they played a good game. They held AP in check (even though he had 99 yards) but they did not let him break a big run. Rodgers was on fire. That drive at the end of the first 1/2....What did it take about 1 min... That is impressive. The packers even had somewhat of a running game. If they play that way again they will beat San Fran. But I think the buzz saw in the NFC is the Sea Hawks. They look tough and are on a roll.
I think it took the Falcons 23 seconds to get in field goal range and win their game, but if he would of went for it and they threw an int., they would be all over him for taking that chance, he was in a no win situation with the fans there, would of liked to see Peyton win the super bowl, pretty class act player...KEN W said:So....was John Fox and his kneel down call with 30 sec. left and 2 time outs a bone headed play or what?Reminded me of Denny Green doing that in the 99 game against the Falcons.
Agree, that's where they lost the game, if no one was open he could of ate the ball and still kept the clock going and made them use there last TO, playing not to lose and instead of playing to win usually means you'll lose.............southdakbearfan said:I thought the bigger screw up was prior to punting, 3rd and 7, and you don't give payton manning a try to get a first down that would have ended the game?