Joined
·
70 Posts
CNN just flashed its snap-poll results on the TV. Palin beat expectations, but you knew she was going to do that, all she had to do was breathe, remember her 2 1/2 weeks worth of prepping for the 2 hour event, not read from her note cards too much, and smile. Biden beat expectations, too-and his were a lot higher going in.
The CNN poll showed that voters by a more than 10-point margin declaring Biden the winner, and only a slight up-tick in the percentage of people who say Palin is ready to be president of the United States (with a majority still saying she's not).
Here are some actual numbers, these on the question of who won:
http://thepage.time.com/2008/10/02/deba ... iden-wins/
CBS poll: Biden 46%, Palin 21%, tie 33%. http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/10/02/ ... 223005475/
CNN poll: Biden 51%, Palin 36%. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... ectations/
In other news, I didn't quite win my Palin bingo game at the VP watch party.
If you can't read it, the bottom line reads, "Try and score a 'media blackout' by filling in all the boxes on your card!"
For anyone that thinks she won any part of the debate last night, you are missing many obvious things. First and most importantly as SiouperDave pointed out in the other thread with that spot on video clip, she didn't answer one question at any point in the night. When caught with something she wasn't prepared for, she went off on memorized talking points, often mispronunciating words, scrambling issues, and pulling in thoughts on totally unrelated topics.
And with a little wink and a smile she said she wants to expand the VP powers more than Cheney did!
She is more scary than I thought.
Looks like that many voter panels assembled agreed with my analysis. Looking here though, one would think that she performed well enough to erase any doubts that we were all completely wrong.
The only group that feels she did well is those who had a vested interest in liking her before the debate. Many of you fall into that category. They feel relieved that she didn't fall fat on her face, and that the Republican ticket didn't completely die, and can remain on the limited life support it is currently on. It is those folks (like many here) that are making a claim that she was victorious in the debate. She had limited expectations, and people give her the win because she was simply able to memorize a few talking points. It was sorely obvious this was the extent of any win.
Once again, the usual political analysis from here is skewed and doesn't reflect what joe common on main street America feels.
Don't believe me? Go look at what folks are saying today. Look at the voter panels, don't believe the political pundits.
Then again I'm sure that everything is rigged, the polls are fake, the voter panels are made up, the moon landing was faked, bigfoot exists and 9/11 never happened right?
The CNN poll showed that voters by a more than 10-point margin declaring Biden the winner, and only a slight up-tick in the percentage of people who say Palin is ready to be president of the United States (with a majority still saying she's not).
Here are some actual numbers, these on the question of who won:
http://thepage.time.com/2008/10/02/deba ... iden-wins/
CBS poll: Biden 46%, Palin 21%, tie 33%. http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/10/02/ ... 223005475/
CNN poll: Biden 51%, Palin 36%. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... ectations/
In other news, I didn't quite win my Palin bingo game at the VP watch party.

If you can't read it, the bottom line reads, "Try and score a 'media blackout' by filling in all the boxes on your card!"
For anyone that thinks she won any part of the debate last night, you are missing many obvious things. First and most importantly as SiouperDave pointed out in the other thread with that spot on video clip, she didn't answer one question at any point in the night. When caught with something she wasn't prepared for, she went off on memorized talking points, often mispronunciating words, scrambling issues, and pulling in thoughts on totally unrelated topics.
And with a little wink and a smile she said she wants to expand the VP powers more than Cheney did!
She is more scary than I thought.
Looks like that many voter panels assembled agreed with my analysis. Looking here though, one would think that she performed well enough to erase any doubts that we were all completely wrong.
The only group that feels she did well is those who had a vested interest in liking her before the debate. Many of you fall into that category. They feel relieved that she didn't fall fat on her face, and that the Republican ticket didn't completely die, and can remain on the limited life support it is currently on. It is those folks (like many here) that are making a claim that she was victorious in the debate. She had limited expectations, and people give her the win because she was simply able to memorize a few talking points. It was sorely obvious this was the extent of any win.
Once again, the usual political analysis from here is skewed and doesn't reflect what joe common on main street America feels.
Don't believe me? Go look at what folks are saying today. Look at the voter panels, don't believe the political pundits.
Then again I'm sure that everything is rigged, the polls are fake, the voter panels are made up, the moon landing was faked, bigfoot exists and 9/11 never happened right?