Perspective, perspective, perspective........ I stopped going to FB because they took the opposite editorial stance of the one about which you're commenting. For a time, if you advocated any form of nonresident restrictions, your post would never find its way to the board. Those posts advocating no restrictions, even if they got a little nasty, were freely included and sometimes even followed by a staff editorial praising the poster. See FB's advertisers to understand the likely motivation for this practice. Lately FB seems to have loosened things up, but I suspect that was largely because traffic level on the sportsmen's issues forums appeared to be down to a trickle.
Fetch, like the rest of us, can get a little hot sometimes, but I don't think I've visited any site where the moderator or staff didn't advocate one position or another or admonish a poster with a particular unpopular "minority" stance a little more strongly than I thought was appropriate. This site just happens to be used most heavily by those who feel reasonable ND NR restrictions are appropriate. Everyone gets their $.02, and welcome to the site, but I think this is one of those "if you can't stand the heat..." deals.
Fetch, like the rest of us, can get a little hot sometimes, but I don't think I've visited any site where the moderator or staff didn't advocate one position or another or admonish a poster with a particular unpopular "minority" stance a little more strongly than I thought was appropriate. This site just happens to be used most heavily by those who feel reasonable ND NR restrictions are appropriate. Everyone gets their $.02, and welcome to the site, but I think this is one of those "if you can't stand the heat..." deals.