Joined
·
3,556 Posts
NO-bama and Heavy Handed Attempt to Silence NRA Ads
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Joined
·
19,689 Posts
There is little difference between one who would violate the first amendment through censorship and one who would burn books. If I remember right we had one of our own say that Palin was a book burner. That turned out false, but the hero of the liberals is what they accused Palin of. Hypocrisy? You bet.
He is as far left as you can get in the senate and right in there with the other gun haters, including Schumer, Kennedy, Feinstein, Pelosi, Dirty Harry, and the rest of the anti-freedom gang.
I see nearly every outdoor and firearms publication I get has adds against Obama. Although it will not happen I would like to see the democrats loose in every state. They need a loud and clear message to keep their hands off our firearms period. They need to get that message through their thick arrogant heads.
Joined
·
163 Posts
Democrats losing in every state? Thats a laugh. I most scared of people that think the chance of not being able to buy ak-47's and armor piercing bullets (which isn't going to happen anyhow) is more important than the other stuff going on in the USA right now. Recession anybody? I've heard guys on here talking about taking their guns and going into hiding which I think is a great idea... just do it somewhere far away from my friends and family. Most of America wants change right now, and sticking with plainsman language, maybe some of the people around here can get that through their thick, arrogant heads.
Joined
·
19,689 Posts
Plainsman wrote:
If your not worried about firearms willy you must not be much of a hunter. Or you don't mind single shot only. You need to do a lot of catchup on what Obama is likely to want. It should scare about 90% of America firearms owners/hunters. Why else would Obama be trying to censor the NRA. That's a neat trick considering we have a 1st amendment that guarantees freedom of speech. I suppose speaking against Obama is sedition against the messiah of change.
Just for frosting on the cake why don't you tell me how Obama gives you hope.
Seriously though, do you own a firearm? I ask because you clearly portray gun owners as radicals. For example you said:
willythekid wrote:
Try to stick with the program willy, that is essentially what I said in the first place.
Well willy if it's change you want how about a socialist nation with no private weapons of any kind. That's change. We are pretty much socialist already, but we still have firearms. I would want to know what the change is before I run around cackling change, change, change.
If your not worried about firearms willy you must not be much of a hunter. Or you don't mind single shot only. You need to do a lot of catchup on what Obama is likely to want. It should scare about 90% of America firearms owners/hunters. Why else would Obama be trying to censor the NRA. That's a neat trick considering we have a 1st amendment that guarantees freedom of speech. I suppose speaking against Obama is sedition against the messiah of change.
Just for frosting on the cake why don't you tell me how Obama gives you hope.
Seriously though, do you own a firearm? I ask because you clearly portray gun owners as radicals. For example you said:Full auto's have been outlawed since I think about 1936. Sure you can get a special permit, but it is restricted. The problem is willy that you think anyone concerned about firearms ownership only want AK47 and armor piercing. If you have that warped a perception of gun owners I can only assume you don't own or know anyone who owns a firearm. Most of the people that are concerned want to keep their 1911, 870, semi auto deer rifle etc. If you haven't noticed every time the anti firearms people show a person shooting a semi auto they are actually shooting a full auto. Is that what you have bought into?
Joined
·
70 Posts
I know what you are trying to say willy. It is a joke. I read on another post here that there is going to be a landslide in the election. I think that they missed the direction of that landslide though.willythekid said:
Um ok I think we are well into the second amendment with this post now
Well this might sound a little bad, sort of on the crazy side of right wing, but…..for the purpose of debate; I thought our second amendment gave us the right to bear arms? Or in other words to own arms, that doesn't just mean guns, that means all and any type of arms, if you had the means and wanted a battleship or tank or fighter jet or yes even an fully automatic anything, then we should be able to own them. It was meant as deterrence to tyranny. To guaranty the people always had the means to fight our own government. It had nothing to do with hunting or the shooting sports, but it did a nice job at guaranteeing that as well. And thank god we still have hunting in this country or our right to bear arms would have probably been done away with long ago. It seems that that this point gets missed in this discussion. We are just as vulnerable today of tyranny as we were the day we won our independence, maybe even more so now since I don't know anyone with a tank or Blackhawk in their back yard. I think we suffer from an overly complacent form of trust when it comes to our government and a bazaar belief that that sort of thing could never happen in America. I find that very strange when you look at the things going on today in the world and even our own country. Hell our current president's grandfather was even accused of assisting and supporting in an attempted coup in this country.
Happy hunting!
Over and out-
:lol:
Well this might sound a little bad, sort of on the crazy side of right wing, but…..for the purpose of debate; I thought our second amendment gave us the right to bear arms? Or in other words to own arms, that doesn't just mean guns, that means all and any type of arms, if you had the means and wanted a battleship or tank or fighter jet or yes even an fully automatic anything, then we should be able to own them. It was meant as deterrence to tyranny. To guaranty the people always had the means to fight our own government. It had nothing to do with hunting or the shooting sports, but it did a nice job at guaranteeing that as well. And thank god we still have hunting in this country or our right to bear arms would have probably been done away with long ago. It seems that that this point gets missed in this discussion. We are just as vulnerable today of tyranny as we were the day we won our independence, maybe even more so now since I don't know anyone with a tank or Blackhawk in their back yard. I think we suffer from an overly complacent form of trust when it comes to our government and a bazaar belief that that sort of thing could never happen in America. I find that very strange when you look at the things going on today in the world and even our own country. Hell our current president's grandfather was even accused of assisting and supporting in an attempted coup in this country.
Happy hunting!
Over and out-
:lol:
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Join the discussion
