This should be brought back up to the top since Tucker is doing shows on this.
I will say it again. For anyone who broke into the capital (even escorted by police) should still get trespassing and what not.
But the issue I have is why did they not listen to the Intel?
Let's put it this way.... Mitch must also be behind the "stand down" type order and what not. Otherwise, why is he going so hard at this opinion/news piece by Tucker? Why is Schummer out talking for people to be fired and what not? Is he against Freedom of the press? He wants to control what news stories people do or don't do?
What Tucker is exposing is how this was a HUGE SCREW UP by many. It shows how our elected officials are more about pushing partisan BS than actually finding out the truth to things.... looking at you J6 Committee.
But what is getting me the most is how the people of J6 are being treated by our criminal/court system compared to people who rioted, looted, still bombing, burning, etc. other federal buildings. Look how some in that Atlanta "cop land" riot this past weekend have already gotten bail. Were as some of the J6 people were denied bail. That is what is absurd.
Now here is a kicker. You have Ray Epps on camera calling to "storm" and what not the capital. Yet he hasn't faced one charge. Trump never said to "storm" the capital at all. Yet they want to charge him? Let that sink in when you hear liberals or anyone talking about "charging" Trump. If Epps doesn't get charged and convicted.... neither can Trump. Epps said a lot more direct-action things than Trump ever did.