This one falls into the catagory of "the heart's in the right place, but....." I'm sure this legislation is squarely aimed at trying to keep birds in-state in light of the rolling boat show we've experienced lately.
Now, PH, before you get your hackles up, I'm willing to recognize that some residents (i.e. Fetch) also use boats, but you have to admit (and the G&F would agree) that the average nonres. is more likely to use boats in the pursuit of waterfowl than the average res. Maybe, the use of such boats is not as prevelant as some would perceive, but I'm not buying your earlier statement that all those rigs come tooling across the border with boats in tow merely to haul dekes and other equipment (hell, they usually squeeze the dekes in between the four-wheelers - never figured that one out either).
This bill has the admirable goal of trying to make less out of more. Change hunting tactics and lcreate a reduced affect on pressure and the birds to in theory support more hunters. Not going to work, for the reasons outlined by others above - some hunters and hunting situations almost entirely require boats, yes even those with motors. Not for me, but the diver and other big water guys need power motors and someone's going to get hurt trying to still access the big water with a Minnkota.
This is a further illustration of there being no magic bullet on the waterfowl issues, and that you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. To me it's like the access argument for waterfowl. More access so more of us can watch everything fly over, or watch them go into one-a-day, mid-day feeding habits earlier, and/or watch them pile up onto the rest areas and refuges earlier?
Bottom line, we need less hunter days. Under our current licensing format (2 7-day periods for nonres's), that means less hunters. Dont' think shortening the periods to 2 5-days wouldn't mean a whole lot, as most of the nonres's I know don't hunt the full 7 day stint anyhow.
Because of the use factor adjustment in the HPC, different hunting tactics and therefore success rates are accounted for. In essence, HPC adjusts for the harder hunting and better equipment and therefore larger take by nonresidents.
Maybe this bill is sort of a shot across the bow or at least a backup plan, in case the HPC isn't accepted? It would certainly keep the some of the birds here longer, and support the GF economy, 'cause Fetch would finally have to go buy a pair of waders.