The following 10 folks first voted YEA on passage of 2048, but then the next day voted NAY to reconsider:
Boe; Boucher; Dosch; Johnson, D.; Kelsch, R.; Kerzman; Kretschmar; Meier; Nicholas; Price;
following 9 voted NAY on the bill, but YEA to reconsidering it
Bellew; Delzer; Ekstrom; Gulleson; Iverson; Schmidt; Thoreson; Warner; Speaker Wentz
(Wrangham voted NAY on passage, and was absent for reconsideration. Both Belter and Onstad, missing the passage vote, voted Yea to reconsider)
22 people actually moved their vote on the issue, but in the process preserved the status quo. Are we to believe that overnight more than 20% of the folks in the house changed their mind? Does collusion have one "l" or two?
Boe; Boucher; Dosch; Johnson, D.; Kelsch, R.; Kerzman; Kretschmar; Meier; Nicholas; Price;
following 9 voted NAY on the bill, but YEA to reconsidering it
Bellew; Delzer; Ekstrom; Gulleson; Iverson; Schmidt; Thoreson; Warner; Speaker Wentz
(Wrangham voted NAY on passage, and was absent for reconsideration. Both Belter and Onstad, missing the passage vote, voted Yea to reconsider)
22 people actually moved their vote on the issue, but in the process preserved the status quo. Are we to believe that overnight more than 20% of the folks in the house changed their mind? Does collusion have one "l" or two?
m.SECOND READING OF SENATE BILL
SB 2048: A BILL for an Act to create and enact a new section to chapter 20.1-03 and a new subsection to section 20.1-03-12 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to resident waterfowl licenses; and to amend and reenact sections 20.1-03-07.1 and 20.1-08-04 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to a limitation on the number of nonresident waterfowl hunters.
ROLL CALL
The question being on the final passage of the amended bill, which has been read, and has committee recommendation of DO PASS, the roll was called and there were 47 YEAS,
45 NAYS, 0 EXCUSED, 2 ABSENT AND NOT VOTING.
YEAS: Aarsvold; Berg; Bernstein; Boe; Boehning; Boucher; Carlisle; Carlson; Clark; Delmore; Dosch; Eckre; Glassheim; Grande; Hanson; Hawken; Johnson, D.; Kasper; Kelsch, R.; Kelsh, S.; Kerzman; Koppelman; Kretschmar; Kroeber; Maragos; Meier; Metcalf;
Mueller; Nelson; Nicholas; Niemeier; Norland; Nottestad; Pietsch; Porter; Potter; Price; Solberg; Svedjan; Thorpe; Timm; Warnke; Weiler; Wieland; Williams; Winrich; Zaiser
NAYS: Amerman; Bellew; Brusegaard; DeKrey; Delzer; Devlin; Drovdal; Ekstrom; Froelich; Froseth; Galvin; Grosz; Gulleson; Haas; Headland; Herbel; Hunskor; Iverson; Johnson, N.; Keiser; Kempenich; Kingsbury; Klein, F.; Klein, M.; Klemin; Kreidt; Martinson; Monson; Pollert; Rennerfeldt; Ruby; Sandvig; Schmidt; Severson; Sitte; Skarphol; Thoreson; Tieman; Uglem; Wald; Warner; Weisz; Wikenheiser; Wrangham; Speaker Wentz
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: Belter; Onstad
Engrossed SB 2048, as amended, lost.
MOTION
REP. THORESON MOVED that the House reconsider its action whereby SB 2048 failed to pass.
REQUEST REP. THORESON REQUESTED a recorded roll call vote on the motion to reconsider the action whereby SB 2048 failed to pass, which request was granted.
ROLL CALL The question being on the motion to reconsider the action whereby SB 2048 failed to pass, the roll was called and there were 47 YEAS, 46 NAYS, 0 EXCUSED, 1 ABSENT AND NOT VOTING.
YEAS: Aarsvold; Bellew; Belter; Berg; Bernstein; Boehning; Carlisle; Carlson; Clark; Delmore; Delzer; Eckre; Ekstrom; Glassheim; Grande; Gulleson; Hanson; Hawken; Iverson; Kasper; Kelsh, S.; Koppelman; Kroeber; Maragos; Metcalf; Mueller; Nelson; Niemeier; Norland; Nottestad; Onstad; Pietsch; Porter; Potter; Schmidt; Svedjan; Thoreson; Thorpe; Timm; Warner; Warnke; Weiler; Wieland; Williams; Winrich; Zaiser;
Speaker Wentz
NAYS: Amerman; Boe; Boucher; Brusegaard; DeKey; Devlin; Dosch; Drovdal; Froelich; Froseth; Galvin; Grosz; Haas; Headland; Herbel; Hunskor; Johnson, D.; Johnson, N.; Keiser; Kelsch, R.; Kempenich; Kerzman; Kingsbury; Klein, F.; Klein, M.; Klemin; Kreidt; Kretschmar; Martinson; Meier; Monson; Nicholas; Pollert; Price; Rennerfeldt; Ruby; Sandvig; Severson; Sitte; Skarphol; Solberg; Tieman; Uglem; Wald; Weisz; Wikenheiser
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: Wrangham
So the motion to reconsider the action whereby SB 2048 failed to pass, failed.